Count Injuries After They Happen. Or Prevent Them.
Your TRIR went up last quarter. Congratulations — you have officially documented that someone got hurt. POD calls this a failure of prediction. LeadingIndicatorDashboard and SchedulePressureSafetyIndex measure what is about to happen — not what already did.
“We spent two decades tracking TRIR. The number told us who got hurt. Never once did it tell us who was about to get hurt. POD changed the question from counting to preventing.”
— VP of Safety, Multi-State Industrial Contractor
Lagging Metrics vs. Leading Intelligence
One side reacts after injury. The other intervenes before conditions become injuries.
TRIR reviewed quarterly
By the time the number changes, the injury already happened.
Near-misses counted monthly
Three this month, three last month — "same" count hides acceleration.
Safety audits every 90 days
Conditions change daily. A quarterly snapshot misses the drift.
EMR calculated annually
An insurance number, not a prevention tool. Updated once per year.
Leading indicators tracked in real time
Near-miss velocity, fatigue, schedule pressure — updated continuously.
AI detects compound preconditions
Five leading signals analyzed together. Compound risk is always worse than any single factor.
Alerts fire before the incident window
When leading indicators cross thresholds, intervention happens in hours, not months.
Schedule pressure correlated to safety
SchedulePressureSafetyIndex proves the relationship your team felt but could never quantify.
Two Approaches to the Same Jobsite
Left: TRIR bars grow after each injury, confirmed after the fact. Right: Leading indicators catch the preconditions weeks before — and trigger intervention.
Leading Metrics That Change What Happens Next
LeadingIndicatorDashboard tracks five preconditions simultaneously. SchedulePressureSafetyIndex proves the correlation between deadlines and injuries. Together they replace reaction with prevention.
Leading Indicators
PODSchedule Pressure Safety Index
PODThe Platform Behind the Prevention Standard
Five Leading Indicators
Near-miss velocity, fatigue index, schedule pressure, new worker exposure, and toolbox talk completion — all tracked simultaneously with trend analysis and threshold alerts.
Schedule-Safety Correlation
SchedulePressureSafetyIndex calculates the statistical correlation between deadline pressure and safety incidents. When pressure rises, safety degrades — POD quantifies by how much.
Compound Risk Scoring
Individual leading indicators are signals. Combined, they become predictions. POD weights and compounds all five indicators into a single risk probability that updates continuously.
Predictive Intervention Windows
When compound risk crosses the threshold, POD identifies the specific leading indicator driving the elevation — and recommends targeted intervention before the window closes.
Voice-Captured Leading Data
Near-misses, fatigue observations, and pressure signals mentioned in daily voice reports become leading indicator data points automatically — no separate safety forms required.
Historical Pattern Recognition
Specialized AI agents analyze historical correlations between leading indicator profiles and actual incidents. The model learns which compound patterns precede injuries on your specific project.
Frequently Asked Questions
Stop Counting Injuries. Start Preventing Them.
See LeadingIndicatorDashboard and SchedulePressureSafetyIndex on your project — before the lagging number changes.
Continue exploring the standard: