You Built the Schedule. POD Measures If Reality Follows It.
You built the schedule. It took weeks. It has been baselined. Then the first activity slips — and there is no standard for measuring how badly reality has diverged. Until now.
How POD Measures Schedule Execution Fidelity
From voice report to schedule intelligence in three steps — no manual Gantt updates required.
Speak Your Daily Report
Your superintendent speaks a 5-minute voice report from the field. POD transcribes activity starts, completions, delays, and progress — mapping every data point to schedule KPI fields in real time.
AI Computes Schedule Fidelity
Specialized AI agents compare reported activity progress against the baseline schedule. SPI(t), earned duration, activity start reliability by area, and projected completion dates are calculated instantly.
Dashboard Shows Plan vs. Reality
EarnedScheduleTracker and ActivityStartReliability update on your dashboard — showing exactly where reality has diverged from the plan, how fast, and what it means for your projected completion date.
The Scheduler's Blind Spot
You create the most detailed schedule in the industry. But you have no standard for measuring whether the field is following it — or how fast it is diverging.
The Gantt says on-track. The field says otherwise.
Your CPM schedule shows 2% float remaining. But 6 of 20 activities that were supposed to start this week have not started. The Gantt chart cannot see that — it only updates when someone manually enters progress. By the time the schedule shows trouble, you are already three weeks behind.
SPI in dollars goes to 1.0 — even when you are late
Traditional Schedule Performance Index is measured in cost, not time. As projects approach completion, SPI always converges toward 1.0 regardless of how late you are. A project that finishes 6 months late can still show SPI = 1.0 at completion. The metric lies at the moment you need it most.
No standard exists for measuring plan execution fidelity
You spent weeks building the baseline schedule. It was reviewed, approved, resource-loaded. Then reality diverges — and there is no standard measurement for how much. Did 68% of activities start on time? Did you earn 142 days of schedule against 160 actual? Without POD, you do not know.
Plan vs. Reality — The Split Screen Your Gantt Cannot Show
Planned bars vs. actual bars. Start reliability scores. SPI(t) speedometer. The full picture of schedule execution fidelity — animated in real time.
What the Schedule Execution Standard Delivers
Earned Schedule in time, not dollars
SPI(t) measures schedule performance in units of time — so it stays accurate all the way to project completion. You earned 142 days of work in 160 actual days. SPI(t) = 0.89. That number tells you the truth when traditional SPI would lie.
SPI(t) = 0.89Activity Start Reliability by area
Of the 20 activities planned to start this week, 14 actually started on time. That is 68% start reliability. Building B is at 55%. Site Work is at 80%. You know exactly where the plan is falling apart — before the Gantt updates.
68% start reliabilityProjected completion vs. contract date
Based on current SPI(t), POD projects your actual completion date against the contract completion date. Right now: 23 days late. That number updates daily from field data — not from quarterly schedule updates.
23-day variance alertTrend analysis across weeks and months
SPI(t) trended from 0.98 in Month 1 to 0.89 in Month 4. Start reliability dropped from 72% to 61% then recovered to 68%. These trends show whether your recovery plan is working — or whether the divergence is accelerating.
Trend intelligenceThe Scheduler's Standard — Plan Execution Rate and Schedule Performance
EarnedScheduleTracker shows SPI(t) and schedule variance in time. ActivityStartReliability shows which areas are following the plan — and which are not.
Earned Schedule
Start Reliability
The Platform That Measures Plan Execution
Baseline Schedule Integration
Import your P6, MPP, or Excel schedule. POD maps activities to its earned schedule engine — computing earned duration from daily field reports automatically.
Start Reliability by Zone
Break down start reliability by building, area, floor, or zone. See which parts of the project are following the plan — and which are silently diverging.
Voice-First Schedule Updates
No manual Gantt updates. Your super speaks the daily report, and POD captures which activities started, which completed, and which were delayed — updating schedule KPIs instantly.
Schedule Divergence Alerts
When SPI(t) drops below 0.90 or start reliability falls below 70%, POD alerts your project controls team — days or weeks before the Gantt chart shows the problem.
Timeline Playback for Schedules
Rewind your schedule performance to any point in the project. Compare this week's start reliability against last month. Watch SPI(t) trend over the project lifecycle.
Audit-Ready Schedule Reports
Export earned schedule data, start reliability by area, and SPI(t) trends in formats that satisfy owner, lender, and auditor requirements — with data integrity built in.
“Activity start reliability was 55% on Building B. The schedule looked fine in the Gantt. POD showed us reality was diverging 3 weeks before the Gantt caught up.”
— Senior Scheduler, Infrastructure Program
Frequently Asked Questions
Your Schedule Deserves a Standard. POD Is It.
See EarnedScheduleTracker, ActivityStartReliability, and the full schedule intelligence platform in action — with your baseline schedule and field data.
Related standards: