Planned, Earned &Actual Cost
Three numbers, read at the same moment, are the whole foundation of earned value. Confuse any two of them and every index built on top goes wrong.
Planned value (PV), earned value (EV), and actual cost (AC) are the three measurements earned value management is built on. Planned value is the budgeted cost of work scheduled by now, earned value is the budgeted worth of work actually done, and actual cost is what that work has cost.
Read at one moment
All three numbers are taken at the same cut-off, called the data date. On our $12.0M project at month 8, the plan called for half the budget to be earned, so planned value is $6.0M. Only 45% of the work is actually finished, so earned value is $5.4M. And the accounting system shows $6.3M spent, which is actual cost.
Two gaps fall straight out of the chart. Planned value sitting above earned value is the schedule gap, the schedule variance of −$0.6M. Actual cost rising above earned value is the cost gap, the cost variance of −$0.9M. Both are negative here, which is the shape of a job that is behind and over.
The same three numbers, two naming systems
Older federal and software documentation uses the BCWS, BCWP, and ACWP labels. They map exactly onto the modern PV, EV, and AC. Each simply answers one plain question.
| Modern name | Legacy name | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Planned Value (PV) | BCWS — Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled | How much work should be done by now? |
| Earned Value (EV) | BCWP — Budgeted Cost of Work Performed | How much work is actually done? |
| Actual Cost (AC) | ACWP — Actual Cost of Work Performed | What did that work cost? |
Earned value is the number to get right
Planned value comes straight from the baseline. Actual cost comes straight from accounting. Only earned value depends on judgment, because it is percent complete multiplied by the work's budget.
45% × $12.0M = $5.4M
Inflate percent complete and earned value inflates with it, which flatters both the cost and schedule indices and hides trouble. The discipline is to fix an objective percent-complete rule per work type before the work begins. See the percentage-of-completion guide for the methods.
How POD sources the three numbers
POD takes planned value from the frozen budget baseline, earned value from the progress and line-level confirmations in your pay applications, and actual cost from the costs booked against the project. Because all three are held against one versioned baseline, the variances and indices are computed, not transcribed, and they recompute every period from the same source.
The full EVM guideFrequently asked questions
From three numbers to a verdict
Once PV, EV, and AC are honest, the cost and schedule indices follow in two divisions. POD keeps all three tied to one baseline so the verdict is computed, not estimated.